DevelopLast updated April 11, 2025
Leadership development programming is receiving outsized investment relative to its impact
Why It Matters
Current leadership development spend represents 35% of L&D budget but shows limited correlation with leadership effectiveness scores or promotion readiness metrics. Reallocating resources to higher-impact interventions could improve ROI by 40% while better preparing your leadership pipeline.
How We Uncovered This
Data Sources
- • L&D Budget Analysis
- • Leadership 360 Reviews
- • Promotion Readiness Assessments
Methodology
We analyzed the correlation between leadership development program participation and subsequent leadership effectiveness metrics. Despite significant investment, participants showed minimal improvement compared to non-participants on key leadership competencies.
Key Findings
- • Leadership program participants show only 8% improvement in 360 scores vs 5% for non-participants
- • Cost per leadership development hour is 3x higher than peer organizations
- • Only 22% of program content directly maps to identified leadership gaps
- • Manager coaching and stretch assignments show 4x better ROI than formal programs
Related Benchmarks
Leadership Development ROI
DevelopReturn on leadership development investment significantly lags peers
Your Score: 1.2x
Peer Average: 2.8x
Leadership Readiness Pipeline
DevelopFewer leaders are rated as ready for next-level roles
Your Score: 45%
Peer Average: 62%